Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”

Author(s): Vanham, D., A.Y. Hoekstra, Y. Wada, F. Bouraoui, A. de Roo, M.M. Mekonnen, W.J. van de Bund, O. Batelaan, P. Pavelic, W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, M. Kummu, J. Rockström, j. Liu, B. Bisselink, P. Ronco, A. Pistocchi, G. Bidoglio
In: Science of The Total Environment doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056
Year: 2018
Type: Journal / article
Theme affiliation: Landscapes
Link to centre authors: Rockström, Johan
Full reference: Vanham, D., A.Y. Hoekstra, Y. Wada, F. Bouraoui, A. de Roo, M.M. Mekonnen, W.J. van de Bund, O. Batelaan, P. Pavelic, W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, M. Kummu, J. Rockström, j. Liu, B. Bisselink, P. Ronco, A. Pistocchi, G. Bidoglio. 2018. Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: an evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 "Level of water stress". Science of The Total Environment doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056.

Summary

Target 6.4 of the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) deals with the reduction of water scarcity. To monitor progress towards this target, two indicators are used: Indicator 6.4.1 measuring water use efficiency and 6.4.2 measuring the level of water stress(WS). This paper aims to identify whether the currently proposed indicator 6.4.2 considers the different elements that need to be accounted for in a WS indicator. WS indicators compare water use with water availability. We identify seven essential elements: 1) both gross and net water abstraction (or withdrawal) provide important information to understand WS; 2) WS indicators need to incorporate environmental flow requirements (EFR); 3) temporal and 4) spatial disaggregation is required in a WS assessment; 5) both renewable surface water and groundwater resources, including their interaction, need to be accounted for as renewable water availability; 6) alternative available water resources need to be accounted for as well, like fossil groundwater and desalinated water; 7) WS indicators need to account for water storage in reservoirs, water recycling and managed aquifer recharge. Indicator 6.4.2 considers many of these elements, but there is need for improvement. It is recommended that WS is measured based on net abstraction as well, in addition to currently only measuring WS based on gross abstraction. It does incorporate EFR. Temporal and spatial disaggregation is indeed defined as a goal in more advanced monitoring levels, in which it is also called for a differentiation between surface and groundwater resources. However, regarding element 6 and 7 there are some shortcomings for which we provide recommendations. In addition, indicator 6.4.2 is only one indicator, which monitors blue WS, but does not give information on green or green-blue water scarcity or on water quality. Within the SDG indicator framework, some of these topics are covered with other indicators.

Share

Stockholm Resilience Centre is a collaboration between Stockholm University and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Stockholm Resilience Centre
Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B
SE-10691
Phone: +46 8 674 70 70
info@stockholmresilience.su.se

Organisation number: 202100-3062
VAT No: SE202100306201