Stockholm Resilience Centre offers interdisciplinary courses on first (Undergraduate), second (Master's) and third (PhD) levels of University education. Want to know more about our courses? Click here!
Our engagement in science-policy-practice activities has increased steadily over the years and range from high-level UN dialogues to local resilience assessments. Want to know more about our policy work? Click here!
Firstly, there is no direct link between ES and the poor's wellbeing due to variable and dynamic mechanisms of access to ES. Secondly, the ES contribution to well-being depends on individual circumstances and need. Thirdly, and as a result of these two points, trade-offs between different ES imply winners and losers and must be analysed according to who derives wellbeing benefits from which ES.
In this video, centre researcher Tim Daw argues for the need to distinguish between different beneficiaries of different ES, and consider how the wellbeing of each is enhanced before we can understand the significance of ES to poverty alleviation.
About Tim Daw
Tim is an interdisciplinary researcher studying coastal resource systems. He has worked with a range of small-scale tropical and industrial high-latitude fisheries and has a background training in ecology, fisheries science, socioeconomics and politics.
He studies linkages between ecological and social components of fisheries at multiple scales. As well as being interesting in their own right, fisheries are an excellent model for understanding the behaviour of social-ecological systems characterised by uncertainty, common-pool resources and local and global drivers.
Daw, T., K. Brown, S. Rosendo, and R. Pomeroy. 2011. "Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Poverty Alleviation: The Need to Disaggregate Human Well-Being." Environmental Conservation 38 (04): 370-379. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000506.