In this video Elena Bennett presents the Seeds of a Good Anthropocene project which has collected some 500 examples of thriving sustainable initiatives across the world.
Seeds of a good Anthropocene
• 100 “seeds of a good Anthropocene” have been analysed to understand the components of a better future that people want
• 6 main themes were identified, including “Agroecology”, “Green Urbanism” and “Fair Futures”.
• Now the researchers encourage people around the world to contribute more examples
There is indeed no lack of stories that document climate change, biodiversity loss, inequality and other examples of unsustainable development around the world. Efforts to envision what better futures could actually look like seldom receive the same attention. But now a group of researchers from the Stockholm Resilience Centre, together with colleagues from around the world, have gathered hundreds of examples of positive initiatives.
They publish their results in an article entitled “Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene” in the October issue of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. The title refers to the new geological epoch called the Anthropocene, which recognizes that humans are profoundly altering the functioning of the Earth's climate and ecosystems.
“Identifying potential seeds of a Good Anthropocene, and understanding how and why they occur, can help us envision how people might grow, combine or use these seeds to allow people and nature to thrive rather than a dystopia we want to avoid”
Albert Norström, co-author
In addition to Albert Norström, Oonsie Biggs, Per Olsson, Garry Peterson and Victor Galaz contributed from the centre, and they did it in a joint project together with researchers from Canada, South Africa, US, UK, the Netherlands, Brazil, Germany and China.
100 seeds analysed
In total, the researchers have analysed 100 of the more than 500 projects that have been contributed to goodanthropocenes.net, the website they have created for the project. These seeds of a good Anthropocene range from projects designed to create healthier school lunches in California to biodiversity conservation in South Africa, and forest conservation in Scotland. The group of researchers believe that there are aspects of these projects that can be used either alone, or in combination with one another to build a better, more sustainable future.
“As scientists, we tend to be very focussed on all the problems, so to look at examples of the sustainable solutions that people are coming up with – and to move towards asking, ‘what do the solutions have in common’ is a big change,” says Elena Bennett, from McGill’s School of the Environment in Canada, who is the lead author of the paper.
The paper is also a move away from the typical academic perspective of looking at things in a top-down way, where the scientists come up with the definitions. Instead, the authors encouraged the people involved in the projects to define what makes a project ‘good’. This was also done because the scientists didn’t want to be driven only by their Northern European or North American sensibilities and rather wanted to see a variety of ideas about what people actually want from the future.
“Most visions of the future are extrapolations of the world of today, and do not capture the changes needed to create an ecologically sustainable, fair, and prosperous world,” adds Garry Peterson.
Six main themes identified
The group of researchers have identified six main overarching themes from the projects that were submitted:
1) “Agroecology”: Projects that adopt social-ecological approaches to enhance food-producing landscapes. One example is the Satoyama Initiative in Japan where urban residents are working with rural people to revive underused rural lands through farm stays and volunteer work along with financial support.
2) “Green Urbanism”: Projects that improve the liveability of urban areas, e.g. New York City’s Highline Park, where native species have been planted on abandoned railway lines to create urban spaces where art, education and recreation are accessible to all.
3) “Future Knowledge”: These are projects which foster new knowledge and education which can be used to transform societies. One example is Greenmatter, a programme in South Africa to provide graduate-level skills for biodiversity conservation.
4) “Urban Transformation”: These are projects that create new types of social-ecological interactions around urban space. One example is the Sukhomajri village in the Himalaya’s where the community has come together to stop Sukhna Lake from silting up and initiate harvesting of rainwater.
5) “Fair Futures”: Efforts to create opportunities for more equitable decision making. One example is City of the Future Lüneburg 2030+ - a project that aims to envision the future city of Lüneburg, Germany in a way that it turns into more sustainable, livable and fair place.
6) “Sustainable Futures”: Social movements to build more just and sustainable futures, e.g. the US based Farm Hack project who share new ideas online to increase the resilience of sustainable agriculture and rural economies. One example is a bicycle powered root washer.
More seeds wanted
The publication in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is by no means the end of the project to identify good seeds of the future. Now, the researchers encourage people around the world to go to the Seeds of a Good Anthropocene website and contribute more examples of sustainability projects of various kinds.
“Seeds of a Good Anthropocene” is a collaboration led by McGill University in Canada, the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University in Sweden, and the Centre for Complex Systems in Transition at Stellenbosch University in South Africa. It forms part of the initiative “Bright Spots – Seeds of a Good Anthropocene,” a Future Earth funded project, which is co-led by the Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS).
Bennett EM, Solan M, Biggs R, McPhearson T, Norström AV, Olsson P, Pereira L, Peterson GD, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Biermann F, Carpenter SR, Ellis EC, Hichert T, Galaz V, Lahsen M, Milkoreit M, López BM, Nicholas KA, Preiser R, Vince G, Vervoort JM, Xu J. 2016. Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology, published online October 05, 2016. doi: 10.1002/fee.1309
Albert Norström is the executive director of the Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) and a researcher with a focus on coastal and marine systems
Oonsie Biggs' research focuses on regime shifts — large, abrupt, long-lasting changes in the dynamics of coupled social-ecological systems that can have dramatic impacts on human economies and societies.
Garry Peterson looks at how on resilience in social-ecological systems and how to improve people's ability to ensure a reliable supply of the ecosystem services that support human well-being.
Per Olsson's primary research interest is in linked social-ecological system dynamics and resilience. His current research is in global sustainability transformations and how to reverse current trends of crossing critical thresholds and tipping points in the Earth system.
Victor Galaz is a deputy science director at the centre. His research elaborates the major governance challenges posed by Earth system complexity, planetary boundaries, and the Anthropocene.
Research news | 2019-08-12
Quite a lot if you ask Jonas Ebbesson, professor of environmental law and member of Stockholm Resilience Centre’s International Science Advisory Board
Research news | 2019-08-07
Optimal antimicrobial use in animal farming must be analysed as a sustainability issue under a social-ecological perspective
Research news | 2019-08-06
New research explores how environmental stewardship attitudes are influenced by the benefits humans receive from their environment
Research news | 2019-08-06
Are certification schemes contributing to better environmental performance or is it just a way for corporations to get an in with conscious consumers?
Research news | 2019-08-06
New application adds realism to economic model that take into account probability of environmental risks
Research news | 2019-07-28
Sophisticated risk frameworks operated by many international organizations, companies and governments ignore rapidly evolving global risks driven by environmental change