Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Global food system vulnerable from reliance on fewer exporting countries
- Between 1987 and 2013, food supply diversity increased significantly for most of the world's population
- Increased reliance on trade decreases resilience as more people across the world become exposed to ‘shocks’ like price spikes, export bans, or interruptions induced by climate change
- Greece, Spain and Italy are bucking the trend with higher diversity of production and supply, and number of import partners
The world is enjoying a richer diet but most countries increasingly depend on food imports. That should worry many of them
ALL EGGS IN ONE BASKET: Trade and globalization have been increasing rapidly for decades. That certainly includes food trade, with consumers, particularly in the western world, now enjoying increased access to a variety of proteins, fats, fruits and vegetables, and year-round. It makes for a varied and nutritious diet but also creates a complacency that all food is always available.
In a collaboration with Aalto University, Swedish Agricultural University and Stanford University, centre researchers Miina Porkka, Cibele Queiroz and Max Troell have made a global scale assessment of food trade networks and nutritional diversity. Their work has been published in the journal Global Food Security
The results indicate that, between 1987 and 2013, food supply diversity increased significantly for most of the world's population. However, dependency on imports also increased, with many countries relying on fewer import partners.
This could have significant consequences.
It is alarming that in many countries the studied resilience aspects systematically declined, elevating their exposure to future shocks in the food system.
Matti Kummu, lead author
Trade as a buffer or a cause for shocks
In their assessment, the authors found that Australia, Brazil, Canada, US, Kazakhstan and Argentina (in no particular order) that stand out with regards to export on protein sources and kcal. For fruits and vegetables, Spain and South Africa dominate.
An increased reliance on trade decreases resilience as more people across the world become exposed to ‘shocks’ like price spikes, export bans, or interruptions induced by climate change.
On the other hand, by spreading their imports across many trade partners, countries can buffer against shocks, both domestic and those experienced in exporting countries.
From the analysis the authors were able to identify countries with the most and the least resilience when it comes to trade on dietary energy, protein, fats, vegetables and fruit. Significant decreases in resilience indicators were found in countries ranging from Afghanistan to the US, although the latter is in a better situation to deal with any shocks.
Says co-author Miina Porkka: “Our findings highlight the interconnected trade-offs between trade-related aspects of food system resilience, and provide important information for global actors, as well as national policy makers.”
Re.Think Talks podcast:
The researchers used food balance and trade data by the FAO to construct four indicators that capture trade-related aspects of national food supply over the past three decades: diversity of food production of different commodities, diversity of food supply of different commodities from both local and imported sources, independency of food supply from imports, and connectivity given by the number of major trade partners. These indicators represent two basic principles of a resilient system: maintaining diversity and redundancy, and managing connectivity.
Diversity allows systems to compensate for the loss or failure of some components with other functionally redundant components. Well-connected systems can overcome and recover from local disturbances faster by “importing” sources of resilience from elsewhere, but on the other hand, high dependency on imported sources of resilience exposes systems to the spread of external disturbances.
The four indicators were calculated for four nutritional components: dietary energy (kcal), protein (g), fat (g), and quantity of vegetables & fruits (g). These components provide different nutritional functions and are the basic pillars of WHO diet recommendations.
Kummu, M., Kinnunen, P., Lehikoinen, E., Porkka, M., Queiroz, C., Röös, E., Troell, M., Weil. C. 2020. Interplay of trade and food system resilience: Gains on supply diversity over time at the cost of trade independency. Global Food Security, Volume 24, March 2020, 100360
Research news | 2021-06-23
Better scenario building can help curb global threat of invasive species
Invasive species remain largely ignored in current future analyses. Experts present first set ever of alternative futures for global biological invasions
Research news | 2021-06-22
New software helps design sustainable cities
Natural Capital Project have developed a software that shows city planners where to invest in nature to improve people’s lives. It will also save billions of dollars
Research news | 2021-06-21
Looking for land to build? Go where nature can help you
Proximity to ecosystem services raises the value of residential and commercial areas around cities. Future projects should focus more to keep it that way
Research news | 2021-06-18
How much is the right amount of meat?
Celebrating World Sustainable Gastronomy Day, centre doctoral student Kajsa Resare Sahlin on why we need to better understand how much ‘less’ meat actually is and what ‘better’ means
Research news | 2021-06-18
The accidental chef
How a former PhD student’s book on food and life in the Pamir Mountains won the world’s most prestigious culinary book award
Research news | 2021-06-16
The global issue of local fisheries livelihoods
Blanca González García-Mon, a PhD student at the Stockholm Resilience Centre, explains the important role of small-scale fisheries in global sustainability