In three studies published in Water Resources Research, One Earth, and Earth’s Future, researchers argue that existing methods and frameworks fail to grasp the planetary consequences of human interferences on the water cycle. Photo: C. Leopold/Flickr

Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote

WATER SUSTAINABILITY

Saving the planet’s bloodstream

Researchers urge hydrology and water community to join the “Grand Challenge” in establishing safe limits to human interference with the global water cycle

Story highlights

  • Humans change landscapes and ecosystems to the point that water may go from being a friend to becoming a foe
  • Existing methods and frameworks fail to grasp the planetary consequences of human interferences on the water cycle
  • The Planetary Boundaries framework can represent a suitable framework to elaborate on

"WE HAVE LOTS OF WORK TO DO": Water is at the center of the planetary drama currently unfolding before our very eyes. Water not only supports ecosystem services like food and energy, it is also a critical regulator of temperature and climate on Earth.

As it flows through rivers and streams, rests in lakes and oceans, and falls as rain, water serves as the bloodstream of the biosphere. Any changes to water’s stabilizing capacity could push societies to the brink of collapse.

Despite this, humans continue to change landscapes and ecosystems to the point that water may go from being a friend to becoming a foe.

Why?

Part of the problem is that there are no global water management organizations, and consequences of human actions are not always felt at a regional level. Deforestation in one area of the world may trigger increased floods or droughts in another faraway region.

Failing to grasp the planetary consequences

Water resources management concepts and frameworks are typically designed for the local to regional scale. In three studies recently published in Water Resources Research, One Earth, and Earth’s Future, centre researcher Lan Wang-Erlandsson with colleagues argue that such existing methods and frameworks fail to grasp the planetary consequences of human interferences on the water cycle.

In their studies, Wang-Erlandsson and her colleagues illuminate the role of the water cycle for maintaining fundamental Earth system functioning, and present a roadmap for detecting, monitoring, and establishing safe global limits to water cycle modifications, and present an approach to include planetary stability in local water resource governance and management.

It is startling that we do not know at what point human modifications of the water cycle may cause major disruptions of the Earth System.

Lan Wang-Erlandsson, co-author

Towards a revised water planetary boundary

The authors believe a robust, holistic, and locally applicable framework for Earth system water governance is needed to complement existing local-regional scale water governance.

The Planetary Boundaries framework, which sets quantified boundaries to human perturbation of key Earth processes including freshwater use, is considered the most suitable framework to depart from.

This means reframing the “freshwater use planetary boundary” to a “water planetary boundary” which accounts for the importance of all five major water stores: atmospheric water, soil moisture, surface water, groundwater, and frozen water. This highlights four fundamental Earth system functions of the global water cycle: hydroclimatic, hydroecological, transport, and storage. The use of sub-boundaries could further make the water planetary boundary more measurable as well as understandable to both hydrologists and a broader public.

To succeed, Wang-Erlandsson and her colleagues urge the hydrology and water resource community to join a “Grand Challenge” in order to develop the suggested water planetary sub-boundaries.

“We are excited by our proposed new water planetary boundaries and how to quantify them over the coming years – we have lots of work to do," says lead author Tom Gleeson from University of Victoria.

A Road Map for Developing the New Water Planetary Sub-boundaries. Click on illustration to acess scientific study

Methodology

The papers are based on multiple workshops, working groups, and intense collaboration and debate. Using a series of concepts including dynamic systems, resilience theory, Earth System science and the planetary boundaries framework, and building on previous attempts in the systems and resilience literature, the authors identify key components of Earth System resilience and synthesize evidence regarding regional disruptions to water functions.

Reframing of the water planetary boundary framework is suggested based on a qualitative evaluation composed of seven criteria for defining a useful water planetary boundary. It expands on the set of criteria originally used for identifying useful control variables for planetary boundaries, with additional requirement related to the capability of that variable to act as a robust indicator of process change, among others. The authors further note that this analysis could be used to evaluate other planetary boundaries, especially those with no clear global tipping points and whose critical transitions start at the regional or local scales, such as land use or biodiversity loss.

Link to publications:

 Water Resources Research

One Earth

Earth’s Future

Citation

Gleeson, T., Wang-Erlandsson, Miina Porkka, Zipper, S.C., Jaramillo, F., Gerten, D., et.al. 2020. Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth System resilience in the Anthropocene. Water Resources Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024957

Link to publication

Gleeson, T., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Zipper, S.C, et.al. 2020. The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision. One Earth, Perspective, Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp223-234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

Link to publication

Chinese summary

Zipper, S., Jaramillo, F., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Cornell, S., Gleeson, T., Porkka, M., Häyhä, T., Crépin, A-S, Fetzer, I., Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Matthews N., Ricaurte-Villota, C., Kummu M., Wada Y., Gordon, L. 2020. “Integrating the water planetary boundary with water management from local to global scales” Earth’s Future

Link to publication

Blog post by

For more information about the publications, please contact Lan Wang-Erlandsson:

Lan Wang Erlandsson is a postdoctoral researcher in the Planetary Boundary Research Network focusing on the large-scale interactions between land, water, and climate, and their implications for resilience

Share

Stockholm Resilience Centre is a collaboration between Stockholm University and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Stockholm Resilience Centre
Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B
SE-10691
Phone: +46 8 674 70 70
info@stockholmresilience.su.se

Organisation number: 202100-3062
VAT No: SE202100306201