Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS AND DIALOGUE
If you want better conservation, you need to recognize and engage with local experts
- A review and three case-stories show synergies between Indigenous and local knowledge and conservation science
- Cross-fertilization of knowledge led to stronger partnerships and better conservation outcomes
- The Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) approach can guide the design and implementation of collaborative conservation partnerships
Why mobilizing different types of knowledges creates opportunities for long-term sustainable governance
A FULL AND OPEN DIALOGUE: Conservation has for Indigenous peoples and local communities historically often been associated with dispossession of land.
More recently, conservation interventions increasingly recognize the need to partner with local communities and acknowledge the importance of Indigenous and local knowledge systems for managing critical biodiversity.
Such collaborations must be equitable and just to be effective in the long term.
But, with deep potential inequalities and power imbalances in these knowledge partnerships, how could diverse sources of evidence be combined?
Multiple Evidence Base
In a book recently published by Cambridge University Press entitled “Conservation Research, Policy and Practices”, centre authors Pernilla Malmer, Vanessa Masterson and Maria Tengö along with Beau Austin from the Charles Darwin University argue that, taken together, conventional scientific approaches and indigenous and local knowledge can move sustainable development forward in new and important ways.
One way of achieving effective solutions for biodiversity protection is to mobilize multiple knowledges, values and governance systems through collaboration between Indigenous and local knowledge and practices, and Western approaches to science.
Pernilla Malmer, lead author
The authors describe how the Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) approach can guide the design and implementation of collaborative conservation partnerships.
The approach views differing perspectives and methodologies as complementary rather than conflicting, and equally valid and useful for informing and enhance governance of biodiversity.
It has contributed to a move towards broader recognition and inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge holders in multi-level ecosystem assessments such as The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
The authors review scientific and grey literature to describe the extent of uptake of the MEB approach and it’s application in science and policy-practice processes.
Overcoming power imbalances
The authors present three cases to illustrate how a MEB approach can help in overcoming power imbalances, recognizing the integrity of knowledge systems, creating conditions and methodologies for full and open dialogue, and navigating cultural differences: the Kimberly region in Australia, Tharaka river region in Kenya, and the Global Dialogue on Human Rights and Biodiversity Conservation.
The latter two case studies draw on long term engagement with SwedBio’s collaborative partnerships with Indigenous peoples and local communities.
Malmer and her colleagues conclude that a collaborative, inclusive approach such as MEB has potential to support the inclusion of a wider range of evidence in conservation practice, strengthen active participation of local actors and improve conservation partnerships through the recognition and revitalization of local knowledge systems and governance.
"Ultimately, the MEB approach contributes to a much-needed conceptual mind shift to mobilize all knowledge that is useful for maintaining the life-supporting ecosystems in our world."
Malmer, P., Masterson, V., Austin, B., & Tengö, M. 2020. Mobilisation of indigenous and local knowledge as a source of useable evidence for conservation partnerships. In W. Sutherland, P. Brotherton, Z. Davies, N. Ockendon, N. Pettorelli, & J. Vickery (Eds.), Conservation Research, Policy and Practice (Ecological Reviews, pp. 82-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108638210.006
For more information about the book chapter, please contact Pernilla Malmer:
Research news | 2021-09-24
Increased use of AI can create new sustainability risks
Research identifies four areas where the use of AI-technologies can create challenges for both people and planet
Research news | 2021-09-23
Water resilient food systems for future climates
In a statement published by the Global Resilience Partnership, a group of 31 globally diverse practitioners and researchers, sound a clarion call for water resilience to be brought to the forefront of building resilient and sustainable food systems
Research news | 2021-09-23
New book on how culture and context affect transformative change
The book provides insights from researchers, activists, public servants, the private sector and others across five continents
Research news | 2021-09-23
Why designing policies for extreme events requires a system overview
While low-cost, rapid responses to extreme events are needed, proactive measures are more important
Research news | 2021-09-22
How can intersectionality contribute to social-ecological systems research?
Intersectionality is firmly making its way into research thinking. What does it offer sustainability scientists?
Research news | 2021-09-21
Three things needed for successful climate adaptation in cities
Freiburg, Durban and Singapore show why combining social, nature-based and technological solutions to urban climate challenges can work