Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS AND DIALOGUE
If you want better conservation, you need to recognize and engage with local experts
- A review and three case-stories show synergies between Indigenous and local knowledge and conservation science
- Cross-fertilization of knowledge led to stronger partnerships and better conservation outcomes
- The Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) approach can guide the design and implementation of collaborative conservation partnerships
Why mobilizing different types of knowledges creates opportunities for long-term sustainable governance
A FULL AND OPEN DIALOGUE: Conservation has for Indigenous peoples and local communities historically often been associated with dispossession of land.
More recently, conservation interventions increasingly recognize the need to partner with local communities and acknowledge the importance of Indigenous and local knowledge systems for managing critical biodiversity.
Such collaborations must be equitable and just to be effective in the long term.
But, with deep potential inequalities and power imbalances in these knowledge partnerships, how could diverse sources of evidence be combined?
Multiple Evidence Base
In a book recently published by Cambridge University Press entitled “Conservation Research, Policy and Practices”, centre authors Pernilla Malmer, Vanessa Masterson and Maria Tengö along with Beau Austin from the Charles Darwin University argue that, taken together, conventional scientific approaches and indigenous and local knowledge can move sustainable development forward in new and important ways.
One way of achieving effective solutions for biodiversity protection is to mobilize multiple knowledges, values and governance systems through collaboration between Indigenous and local knowledge and practices, and Western approaches to science.
Pernilla Malmer, lead author
The authors describe how the Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) approach can guide the design and implementation of collaborative conservation partnerships.
The approach views differing perspectives and methodologies as complementary rather than conflicting, and equally valid and useful for informing and enhance governance of biodiversity.
It has contributed to a move towards broader recognition and inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge holders in multi-level ecosystem assessments such as The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
The authors review scientific and grey literature to describe the extent of uptake of the MEB approach and it’s application in science and policy-practice processes.
Overcoming power imbalances
The authors present three cases to illustrate how a MEB approach can help in overcoming power imbalances, recognizing the integrity of knowledge systems, creating conditions and methodologies for full and open dialogue, and navigating cultural differences: the Kimberly region in Australia, Tharaka river region in Kenya, and the Global Dialogue on Human Rights and Biodiversity Conservation.
The latter two case studies draw on long term engagement with SwedBio’s collaborative partnerships with Indigenous peoples and local communities.
Malmer and her colleagues conclude that a collaborative, inclusive approach such as MEB has potential to support the inclusion of a wider range of evidence in conservation practice, strengthen active participation of local actors and improve conservation partnerships through the recognition and revitalization of local knowledge systems and governance.
"Ultimately, the MEB approach contributes to a much-needed conceptual mind shift to mobilize all knowledge that is useful for maintaining the life-supporting ecosystems in our world."
Malmer, P., Masterson, V., Austin, B., & Tengö, M. 2020. Mobilisation of indigenous and local knowledge as a source of useable evidence for conservation partnerships. In W. Sutherland, P. Brotherton, Z. Davies, N. Ockendon, N. Pettorelli, & J. Vickery (Eds.), Conservation Research, Policy and Practice (Ecological Reviews, pp. 82-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108638210.006
For more information about the book chapter, please contact Pernilla Malmer:
Research news | 2022-01-18
Safe planetary boundary for pollutants, including plastics, exceeded, say researchers
There has been a 50-fold increase in the production of chemicals since 1950. This is projected to triple again by 2050
Research news | 2022-01-18
International trade important to consider for sustainability of Baltic fisheries
Researchers develop a method to quantify never-seen-before conditions in the Baltic Sea region. Fast, global changes may have negative consequences for sustainability
Research news | 2022-01-10
Peter Jørgensen receives European Research Council starting grant
The grant consists of 1,5 million Euro over five years for studying the emergence of new problem species in agriculture and human health
Research news | 2021-12-16
Freshwater biodiversity must be given a higher priority
Research and conservation of freshwater biodiversity is lagging behind. Researchers propose 15 priorities to improve knowledge on biodiversity in lakes, rivers, ponds and wetlands
Research news | 2021-12-14
Turning tension into transformation
Too much time is spent debating which agenda for change is best, instead of finding ways to facilitate better interactions among different interests
Research news | 2021-12-14
Global Resilience Partnership releases report on their work at COP26
The report synthesises the key overarching messages from their activities at the conference and offers guidance for future actions towards COP27