Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
FROM FOR-PROFIT TO NOT-FOR-PROFIT: The environmental and social challenges and crises facing humanity today beg the question – how can the economy be organised in ways that allow for the fulfilment of every person's needs while also fitting within the ecological limits of the planet?
Researchers in the post-growth strand of political ecology seek to find sustainable ways of organizing the economy that do not require economic growth.
In an article published in Journal of Political Ecology centre PhD student Jennifer Hinton explores the idea that a transition to a post-growth economy requires a change in how businesses relate to profit.
High environmental cost
In the article Hinton argues that in an economy where profit is the main objective, consumerism, economic growth, inequality, and the tendency to destroy the natural environment are inherent features rather than anomalies or market failures.
Economic growth is often seen as the solution to poverty and inequality because it will provide more jobs. However, the growth rate of the economy needs to be exceptionally high in order to create enough jobs to counterbalance the inequality dynamics of the system. And that kind of economic growth comes at a very high environmental cost.
Jennifer Hinton, author
This, Hinton believes, is because profit-seeking requires and drives increasing production and consumption, at the cost of environmental degradation. Business owners accumulate wealth at the cost of wages, causing increased inequalities.
In this economy, profit-seeking investment favors large businesses, so the largest players attract the most investment. This puts pressure on businesses to grow, merge with, and acquire other businesses, leading to market concentration.
And the desire for financial gain, in a setting of inequality and market concentration, inhibits regulations and taxes that might otherwise reduce inequality and ecological damage.
Consumerism on different terms
An economy operating on not-for-profit conditions however would generate very different outcomes.
In such an economy, Hinton argues, the focus would instead lie on creating social benefits and there would be no private business owners to accumulate the surplus.
Without the pressure to deliver dividends, businesses would not have to push people to consume for the sake of increasing profit and would be able to respond to signals that consumerism is bad for people and planet.
That is not to say consumerism would not exist, but it would be on different terms, based on needs rather than wants, and striving to keep the planet healthy as well.
Research news | 2020-10-01
Issues related to gender, power, action and transformations remain largely neglected. That needs to change
Research news | 2020-09-28
Scale of current challenges requires scientists to take on a greater responsibility
Research news | 2020-09-24
Humanity relies on nature in a wide variety of ways. Opening up a diversity of perspectives is critical to identify pathways towards desirable futures
Research news | 2020-09-24
Centre researcher also listed among the world’s most cited researchers
Research news | 2020-09-23
Three projects looking at ways to realise the Sustainable Development Goals receive almost SEK 60 million in funding
Research news | 2020-09-21
A comprehensive assessment of the social, economic, and environmental condition of the Baltic Sea reveals mixed results