Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
URBAN GREEN INEQUALITY
GREEN APARTHEID: South Africa is a compelling country for many reasons. One is how wealth and race go hand in hand.
The legacy of Apartheid and segregation have created glaring divides between those who have (White minority) and those who don’t (Black African, Indian and Coloured majority). Black South Africans, who make up 86% of the population, continue to suffer lower levels of education and incomes than their White counterparts, despite increase in household income.
This inequality extends to all parts of life, including access to urban green areas.
In a study published in Landscape and Urban Planning, centre researcher Vanessa Masterson parts of a team with colleagues from Norway and South Africa, show how forced racial segregation during Apartheid have influenced the distribution of and access to green infrastructure.
By using open-source satellite imagery and geographic information, along with national census statistics, they found that areas with White residents not only enjoy a 6-fold higher income but also live closer to greener areas and parks.
Almost all measures of green infrastructure, including park areas and tree cover, were unequally distributed across race and income. White citizens live on average 700 metres from a park whereas Black African citizens live 2,6 km away. These spatial inequalities are mirrored in both public and private green space.
Living in close proximity to public parks and in greener neighbourhoods appears to be a luxury afforded to wealthier citizens.
Zander Venter, lead author
Green space inequity has gotten worse for Black citizens since Apartheid. This is important because many studies show that green space provides critical benefits to people’s wellbeing.
The historical and contemporary neglect of providing adequate public spaces in Black-African, Indian and Coloured urban areas, coupled with chronic levels of poverty in urban areas may reinforce existing socio-economic inequalities further.
While legislation in South Africa seeks to address these divides, lack of finance and poor cooperation and the view that green spaces are an optional luxury mean that greening programmes have not materialised.
However, the use of open access satellite and census data to show these inequalities provides scope for social advocates to hold governments accountable.
“Any instruments of economic development and redistributive justice would do well to include urban greening agendas to dismantle the racial, economic and green Apartheid in South Africa,” the authors conclude.
Venter, Z., Shackleton, C.M., Van Staden, F., Selomane, O., Masterson, V. 2020. Green Apartheid: Urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 203, November 2020, 103889.
For more information about the study, please contact Vanessa Masterson:
Research news | 2021-01-14
Approximately 100 companies account for more than one-third of high seas fishing
Research news | 2021-01-13
The 100 largest companies that operate within eight ocean industries took an estimated 60% of all revenues. The next step will be to explore their environmental footprint
Research news | 2021-01-12
For households in the Mexican town of Loreto, the chocolate clam means more than just an important source of income. It’s part of their community identity
Research news | 2020-12-29
Improved understanding of how and why people move can reduce future costs and facilitate climate adaptation both within and across borders
Research news | 2020-12-16
Unmanned vessels equipped with echo-sounder makes fish stock monitoring in the Baltic Sea cheaper, easier and kinder to the environment
Research news | 2020-12-15
Efforts by companies to implement sustainability strategies is hampered by reluctance to comply by actors in their supply chains due to complex barriers