Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
DEALING WITH CLIMATE CHANGE
“WE MUST BECOME MUCH BETTER”: Technical solutions alone will not be sufficient to limit warming to no more than 2°C by 2100. Yet, recent reports from the UN climate panel IPCC has tended to focus on the technical potential for mitigating climate change.
What about behavioural, cultural, and social factors?
In a study published in One Earth, centre co-founder Carl Folke together with colleagues from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, UK, and USA suggest a new framework for overcoming the above-mentioned shortcoming of current climate mitigation analyses.
We must become much better at taking societal factors into feasibility analyses and not just technological ones.
Kristian Steensen Nielsen, lead author
Take food consumption, for example. Eating less meat has a large proven technical potential, but the feasibility of achieving this opportunity depends on a number of societal factors, including everything from cultural and social norms to lobbying by meat producers and the availability (and taste) of meat substitutes.
In short, the researchers’ proposed framework adds "behavioral plasticity" and "initiative feasibility" to the standard consideration of "technical potential" of different mitigation pathways.
“If these three factors are addressed explicitly, this framework can also help accelerate transdisciplinary communication and the accumulation of knowledge,” the authors explain.
Whereas the study mainly focuses on climate mitigation at the global level, the authors note that the framework might become useful also for national and local mitigation efforts.
But what does mitigation imply in more concrete terms? Examples discussed in the study include new technologies for energy efficiency, renewable energy, stopping or reversing deforestation, changing lifestyles, and halting population growth.
Whether this will lead to actual reductions (or prevention) of emissions depends on whether individuals, governments, corporations, or others, can take advantage of all these mitigation opportunities.
Regulations, taxes, awareness campaigns, investment and other initiatives to adopt mitigation technologies will be needed to change the behaviour of households, organisations and other target actors.
Obviously, going from opportunities to successful initiatives for mitigation are not automatically seized and do not necessarily achieve their full potential. This is what feasibility is all about, which is defined by IPCC as “the capacity of a system as a whole to achieve a specific outcome.”
Research news | 2021-01-14
Approximately 100 companies account for more than one-third of high seas fishing
Research news | 2021-01-13
The 100 largest companies that operate within eight ocean industries took an estimated 60% of all revenues. The next step will be to explore their environmental footprint
Research news | 2021-01-12
For households in the Mexican town of Loreto, the chocolate clam means more than just an important source of income. It’s part of their community identity
Research news | 2020-12-29
Improved understanding of how and why people move can reduce future costs and facilitate climate adaptation both within and across borders
Research news | 2020-12-16
Unmanned vessels equipped with echo-sounder makes fish stock monitoring in the Baltic Sea cheaper, easier and kinder to the environment
Research news | 2020-12-15
Efforts by companies to implement sustainability strategies is hampered by reluctance to comply by actors in their supply chains due to complex barriers