Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Resilience in practice
Panarchy in the US: Panarchy is a central concept within resilience thinking.
It stresses that all living systems exist and function at multiple scales of space, time and organization, and the interactions across these are crucial for understanding what is happening in the system at any particular time.
One of the rationales behind the panarchy thinking is that “freezing systems” or obstructing even small disturbances to stay within an idealized and narrow range of conditions may trigger several undesired effects.
One classic example is how some forests managers have gone too far in supressing fire in national parks.
The consequence has been that fuel has accumulated and made forest ecosystems more vulnerable to fire in the long run.
Incorporating panarchy-thinking already at project inception can provide a more holistic framework for advancing governance of social–ecological systems.
In a study published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, centre researcher Magnus Nyström and colleagues show how the concept can help improve environmental governance.
They draw experiences from interactions with government agency professionals, private landowners, and legislators in the Nebraskan Sandhill region, one of the last remaining intact prairie regions in North America.
The region is, as most other parts of the great plains, susceptible to invasion by eastern redcedar, a native juniper species that is driving large-scale shifts from grass-to-tree dominance.
The researchers used panarchy as a tool to highlight the importance of allowing periodic small wildfires to maintain grassland dominance of the Sandhills region. This and several other panarchy-related messages were presented in a series of meetings and workshops with the various stakeholders of Sandhill.
Already now the researchers have seen growing awareness in the Nebraska Sandhills of the importance of accounting for cross-scale behaviour in management decisions. This might even lead to reforms of laws and policies based on the new knowledge developed from this research, they say.
“We foresee numerous opportunities in which panarchy can be used to improve environmental governance,” says centre researcher Magnus Nyström.
“Incorporating panarchy-thinking already at project inception can provide a more holistic framework for advancing governance of social–ecological systems,” the authors conclude.
Garmestani, A., Twidwell, D., Angeler, D.G., Sundstrom, S., Barichievy, C. et.al. 2020. Panarchy: opportunities and challenges for ecosystem management. Front Ecol Environ. doi:10.1002/fee.2264
For more information about the study, contact co-author Magnus Nyström:
Research news | 2021-01-14
Approximately 100 companies account for more than one-third of high seas fishing
Research news | 2021-01-13
The 100 largest companies that operate within eight ocean industries took an estimated 60% of all revenues. The next step will be to explore their environmental footprint
Research news | 2021-01-12
For households in the Mexican town of Loreto, the chocolate clam means more than just an important source of income. It’s part of their community identity
Research news | 2020-12-29
Improved understanding of how and why people move can reduce future costs and facilitate climate adaptation both within and across borders
Research news | 2020-12-16
Unmanned vessels equipped with echo-sounder makes fish stock monitoring in the Baltic Sea cheaper, easier and kinder to the environment
Research news | 2020-12-15
Efforts by companies to implement sustainability strategies is hampered by reluctance to comply by actors in their supply chains due to complex barriers